TicWatch watches are manufactured by Mobvoi and have gained a lot of popularity thanks to their combination of elegant designs and advanced functionalities related to concepts such as sports and health. Just like other watches, users have different opinions about their experiences with these wearables. In this article we have compiled some of the main opinions and key points that users usually highlight about TicWatch watches.
The different ranges available from Mobvoi are specifically aimed at different types of users according to the most common requirements that they demand. One of the main characteristics of these watches is that they have a Attractive design with advanced features and integration with Google’s Wear OS.
Is TicWatch a serious option over other brands?
Among the different evaluations that users make of these wearables we find very different opinions. The ones that jump out at you as attributes that really convince their fans are that of having a optimal aesthetics and design with quality materials and precise health features. But among the general opinions we also find others that do not exactly praise the brand’s watches, but rather are a criticism derived from the use of these watches, and that you can find in the product comments on Amazon through this link, such as shorter battery life than they are supposed to have, or certain complaints about slowness when it comes to software performance.
If we go to the flagship like the Ticwatch Pro 5 Enduro as evolution of previous modelssome details that users have said are the following:
There’s still no way to disable the crown’s haptic feedback in sleep mode, which, due to how exposed the crown is, can easily be triggered at night by rubbing against the sheets, and as a light sleeper I find this quite annoying. Therefore, I tend to keep haptic feedback disabled all the time.
Another user shows his complaints about the Pro 5 Enduro in what is becoming a shared complaints also with other users.
My first complaint about the watch is the outdated version of WearOS. Given the timing of this watch’s release just before Google IO, I understand why it didn’t launch with WearOS v5 from the start, but it should at least be on version 4 of the OS, not v3. There’s no real excuse for releasing a great watch with older software like this.
In general, criticism focuses on the fhigh or slow updates, battery problems, and in older models, both battery problems and incompatibility issues with Android are accentuated. So it seems that it is a guarantee to have the most recent models, but taking into account that although it is an alternative to other brands such as Samsung, Apple or Xiaomi, it is true that it is a step behind in terms of functionality and updates, which is something that usually bothers its own users.