While other brands have more than 100W of load accepted, The iPhone 17 would keep 35walthough we understand that they do not look for the fastest load in the world, because of the problems it could give, we did not expect that they would not improve it at least a little more.
Load power of the iPhone 17
Although we still have data, such as the different versions of these, or the ability of their battery, the truth is that the first rumors are not good, and everything indicates that both the base models and the pro They will admit 35Wsomething that, despite the fact that in paper seems to improve, the tests performed on the iPhone 16 reached 37W peaks, so we could simply be talking about the same load power.
This is something that, although years ago I would not love it, because it is true that Apple has improved this, compared to the competition is too slow, since other brands presume to load its devices, between 5 and 15 minutes, while the iPhone needs , quietly, more than 1 hour, which, at night, no matter, however, if you have to leave home and have forgotten to load it, the thing changes, since in those 5 minutes you will barely get 10% battery
Regarding the Wireless loadno changes are not expected, although this year we had a significant improvement, so it is at least understandable that, for the moment, it stays there, since, unlike cable, heating and problems that can generate, in the long run , they are greater, and, therefore, it will be tested little by little. Currently, it is from 25Wnothing wrong.
For now it is time to wait, and who knows, equal Apple rectifies, and, even if, that power goes up to 40W, which would not be a barbarity, but at least it would seem to us that they are trying to improve in this aspect where they are staying far behind.
Apple continues to bet on battery durability Instead of loading speed, but this does not convince everyone. Today, many users prefer a fast charge that allows them to leave the house with sufficient battery in a few minutes, something that with 35W is still complicated.
There is talk of possible improvements in the Optimization of consumption and thermal managementbut without a real increase in loading power, the problem is still there. While rival brands offer full loads in 15 minutes, Apple still needs more than an hour.
And you, what do you think of this? Do you think it is better for the battery to lose some capacity with the months, but you can select when to use a faster load? The truth is that it would not have to be always, and at night we would continue to use the current one, but give the user the opportunity, on a mobile of more than 1,000 euros, it would be theirs, don't you think?
